This topic created in 3116 days ago, the information mentioned may be changed or developed.
 |
1
lucifer9 Nov 27, 2017  30
第二个地址，如果发布在某些地方会被替换成 240c::6**4，哈哈
|
 |
2
CEBBCAT Nov 27, 2017 via Android
这……太反动了
|
 |
3
Kinnice Nov 27, 2017 via Android
大清亡了？？这早就出来了，用了快一年吧。
|
 |
4
Goheing Nov 27, 2017
我上次看见这个新闻，皇太极还在关外。
|
 |
5
RqPS6rhmP3Nyn3Tm Nov 27, 2017 via iPhone 1
上次看见这个新闻的时候，秦始皇还没统一六国
|
 |
6
gamexg Nov 27, 2017
希望 ipv6 快点推动，这样就不用麻烦的内网穿透了。
|
 |
7
Zephyros Nov 27, 2017 1
这篇文章居然公开批评 DNS 劫持，难道不知道 DNS 劫持是国家战略吗？
|
 |
8
jasontse Nov 27, 2017 via iPad
GeoIP 都没搞定就敢出 DNS 笑话
|
 |
10
Shura Nov 27, 2017
|
 |
12
shikkoku Nov 27, 2017
这是 6plat 的 DNS 吧。
|
 |
14
DoraJDJ Nov 27, 2017
6**4，反了反了
|
 |
15
kennylam777 Nov 27, 2017
很好奇這個 DNS 在國內 IPv6 解析 www.facebook.com 會得出甚樣的結果
|
 |
16
LGA1150 Nov 27, 2017 via Android 1
@kennylam777
/tmp/home/root# dig @240c::6666 www.facebook.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> @240c::6666 www.facebook.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6914 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.facebook.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.facebook.com. 1841 IN CNAME star-mini.c10r.facebook.com. star-mini.c10r.facebook.com. 257 IN A 31.13.77.36 ;; Query time: 742 msec ;; SERVER: 240c::6666#53(240c::6666) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 27 09:58:42 UTC 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 90 /tmp/home/root# dig @240c::6666 www.facebook.com aaaa ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> @240c::6666 www.facebook.com aaaa ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60875 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.facebook.com. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.facebook.com. 1838 IN CNAME star-mini.c10r.facebook.com. star-mini.c10r.facebook.com. 588 IN AAAA 2a03:2880:f10d:83:face:b00c:0:25de ;; Query time: 77 msec ;; SERVER: 240c::6666#53(240c::6666) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 27 09:58:45 UTC 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 102 没有污染 |
|
17
kennylam777 Nov 27, 2017
@LGA1150 謝謝, 是教育網嗎? 這樣的解析我怕他會因為「不合規」就突然有一天接相關部門通知要緊急停了......
我也分享一下由 OVH 北美過去那個 6666 的路由, 似乎北美是在 he Fremont 機房有分點(文中的「弗里蒙特」應該就是 Fremont 吧 囧), 不過在文中說也有 Chicago 的 Anycast, 可是在 OVH 就連不到了。 traceroute to 240c::6666 (240c::6666), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2607:5300:xxxx:xxxx:ff:ff:ff:fe (2607:5300:xxxx:xxxx:ff:ff:ff:fe) 38.354 ms 38.497 ms 158.765 ms 2 po111.bhs-g1-a75.qc.ca (2607:5300::125) 0.469 ms 0.664 ms 0.553 ms 3 * 2607:5300::1020 (2607:5300::1020) 1.870 ms 1.359 ms 4 2607:5300::1c9 (2607:5300::1c9) 16.791 ms * 2607:5300::1d1 (2607:5300::1d1) 16.682 ms 5 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.chi1.he.net (2001:504:0:4::6939:1) 19.561 ms * 17.558 ms 6 100ge3-1.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:1b5::1) 72.983 ms 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.chi1.he.net (2001:504:0:4::6939:1) 17.514 ms 100ge3-1.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:1b5::1) 73.000 ms 7 100ge3-1.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:1b5::1) 73.105 ms 73.193 ms 10ge1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (2001:470:0:2f::1) 121.506 ms 8 10ge1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (2001:470:0:2f::1) 75.793 ms 75.800 ms * 9 * * * |
 |
20
cwek Nov 27, 2017
选地址的头头没点政治觉悟啊哈哈哈哈哈→_→
|
 |
21
ovear Nov 27, 2017 via Android
）没有污染的
|
 |
22
lwbjing Nov 27, 2017 via iPhone 3
曾经在某厂，css 样式 64px，发布失败。
|
 |
24
neilp Nov 27, 2017
一楼太........
|
 |
25
liyvhg Nov 27, 2017 via Android
这届地址一点都不讲河蟹
|
|
26
liyvhg Nov 27, 2017 via Android
国内现在有能用的 6in4 或者 6to4 隧道吗？
|
 |
27
aru Nov 27, 2017
试了一下，果然被污染了
国内通过 he 的隧道上的 ipv6 |
|
28
aru Nov 27, 2017
@ovear @LGA1150
dig @240c::6666 twitter.com ; <<>> DiG 9.10.4-P5 <<>> @240c::6666 twitter.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59226 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;twitter.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: twitter.com. 201 IN A 69.63.176.143 ;; Query time: 14 msec ;; SERVER: 240c::6666#53(240c::6666) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 27 22:29:34 CST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 45 这个解析到的 IP 应该是被污染的吧 |
 |
33
wdlth Nov 27, 2017
搞个 6688 不好听么，硬要作死……
2 10ge1-9.core1.hkg1.he.net (2001:470:0:ba::1) 28.577 ms 37.643 ms 37.624 ms 3 100ge8-2.core1.lax2.he.net (2001:470:0:3bf::1) 179.179 ms 179.159 ms 179.033 ms 4 100ge2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (2001:470:0:72::1) 179.010 ms 100ge8-2.core1.pao1.he.net (2001:470:0:375::1) 186.984 ms 100ge2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (2001:470:0:72::1) 179.302 ms 5 10ge7-5.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:32::1) 187.589 ms 100ge9-2.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:1af::1) 187.358 ms 100ge8-2.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:2b7::1) 187.355 ms 6 10ge1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (2001:470:0:2f::1) 187.711 ms 180.844 ms 172.825 ms 2 10ge1-9.core1.hkg1.he.net (2001:470:0:ba::1) 27.441 ms 27.424 ms 27.398 ms 3 100ge8-2.core1.lax2.he.net (2001:470:0:3bf::1) 163.682 ms 179.710 ms 179.730 ms 4 * * * 5 cernet2.net (2001:252:0:302::1) 334.024 ms 333.830 ms 333.880 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 2001:da8:1:1c::2 (2001:da8:1:1c::2) 435.392 ms 433.202 ms 442.932 ms 9 2001:da8:1:50e::2 (2001:da8:1:50e::2) 441.636 ms 426.014 ms 426.319 ms 10 2402:2000:1000:3::2 (2402:2000:1000:3::2) 425.199 ms 429.122 ms 433.010 ms 11 240c:f:0:1::99 (240c:f:0:1::99) 435.153 ms 434.834 ms 437.408 ms 12 240c:f:11::2 (240c:f:11::2) 438.285 ms 440.258 ms 438.568 ms 13 240c:9:599:0:10:255:58:8 (240c:9:599:0:10:255:58:8) 439.107 ms 437.728 ms 437.035 ms 14 240c:f:1:11::133 (240c:f:1:11::133) 441.171 ms * 438.507 ms 这就是所谓的下一代互联网，应该改叫绕一圈吧…… |
 |
35
Midnight Nov 27, 2017
岂不是又要换一波路由？
|
|
36
kennylam777 Nov 27, 2017
@flyfishcn 不是 he 的問題, 以前 PCCW 網上行剛推出 IPv6 時我也測過到教育網, PCCW 到中國教育網還是繞美國
有問題的是 Cernet2, 有一陣子它改路由用 HKIX 的 Peering (全個 HKIX 只有它是 IPv6 only), 有一段時間 RTT 很好的 |
 |
37
flyfishcn Nov 27, 2017
@kennylam777 但是这次绕确实是 he 的问题。我 HK 本地的机器去 he 隧道都要绕美，今天测了一下是恢复了，但是 v4 还是三网全绕。
|
|
38
flyfishcn Nov 27, 2017
@kennylam777 不说 v6 的问题，因为我现在没有原生的 v6 可以测试。只说 v4，电信联通两家和 he 都有 peer，移动有 hkix，铁通不清楚，但是目前也在绕，CN2 也绕了，没什么理由这么多家 ISP 同时对 HE 一家绕路。只能怀疑是 HE 主动调路由了。
|
|
39
wdlth Nov 27, 2017
@flyfishcn AS23911 直接与 HKIX Peering，它们本身就是接的北邮，应该是走 AS24350-AS23910-AS23911 才对，为什么自己再接个 He.net 。而且我测试了别的 Looking Glass，仍然是走 He.net ，所以还是它们的原因。
HostVirtual: traceroute to 240c::6666 (240c::6666), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2403:2500:8000:1::1 1.534 ms 1.490 ms 1.515 ms 2 2403:2500:8000:6::1 0.364 ms 0.368 ms 0.351 ms 3 2001:7fa:0:1::ca28:a19e 1.487 ms 1.463 ms 1.435 ms 4 2001:470:0:3bf::1 154.913 ms 154.895 ms 154.869 ms 5 2001:470:0:375::1 162.847 ms 2001:470:0:72::1 154.872 ms 154.842 ms 6 2001:470:0:2b7::1 163.500 ms 163.419 ms 2001:470:0:1af::1 164.742 ms 7 2001:470:0:2f::1 163.748 ms 164.075 ms 164.039 ms 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * Softlayer: 3 (2607:f0d0:2:2::124) 0.936 ms 0.726 ms 0.741 ms 4 2403:c780:b800:bb00::6939:2 (2403:c780:b800:bb00::6939:2) 4.575 ms 3.952 ms 4.453 ms 5 (2001:470:0:3bf::1) 155.290 ms 155.314 ms 155.276 ms 6 (2001:470:0:72::1) 155.389 ms (2001:470:0:375::1) 163.102 ms (2001:470:0:72::1) 155.285 ms 7 (2001:470:0:1af::1) 163.741 ms (2001:470:0:2b7::1) 165.537 ms (2001:470:0:32::1) 165.629 ms 8 (2001:470:0:2f::1) 196.993 ms 197.027 ms 166.549 ms 9 * * * 10 * * * PCCWGlobal 的 Looking Glass 提示路由只有 6939 45275 一个 CNGI 网还分家，看来确实要搞到下一代去…… |
|
40
LGA1150 Nov 28, 2017 via Android
@aru 教育网解析正常
# dig twitter.com @240c::6666 ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> twitter.com @240c::6666 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55063 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;twitter.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: twitter.com. 133 IN A 104.244.42.193 twitter.com. 133 IN A 104.244.42.129 ;; Query time: 2 msec ;; SERVER: 240c::6666#53(240c::6666) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 27 16:28:27 UTC 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 72 |
Select Language